Congestion Evaluation Best Practices 12
نویسنده
چکیده
Traffic congestion can be evaluated in various ways that result in very different conclusions about the nature of the problem and optimal solutions. This paper describes various factors that affect congestion costing and the evaluation of potential congestion reduction strategies, including the scope of analysis, baseline speeds, travel time unit costs, the impacts of traffic speeds on accident and emission rates, consideration of induced travel impacts, and consideration of co-benefits. It discusses how these factors influence planning decisions, and describes best practices for comprehensive evaluation of congestion impacts. It applies this comprehensive framework to evaluate various congestion reduction strategies including roadway expansion, alternative mode improvements, pricing reforms, smart growth policies and demand management programs.
منابع مشابه
Smart Congestion Relief
How traffic congestion is evaluated can significantly affect transport planning decisions. This report describes various factors that affect congestion cost estimates and the evaluation of potential congestion reduction strategies, including analysis scope, baseline speeds, travel time valuation, accident and emission impact analysis, induced travel analysis, and consideration of co-benefits. I...
متن کاملCongestion Costing Critique : Critical Evaluation of the “ Urban Mobility Report ”
The Urban Mobility Report (UMR) is a widely-cited study that estimates U.S. traffic congestion costs and recommends various congestion reduction strategies. This report critically evaluates its methodologies. The UMR does not reflect best congestion costing methods: it uses higher baseline speeds and travel time unit cost values than experts recommend, exaggerates fuel savings and emission redu...
متن کاملComprehensive Evaluation of Rail Transit Benefits
This report evaluates rail transit benefits based on a comprehensive analysis of urban transportation system performance in major U.S. cities. It discusses best practices for evaluating transit benefits. It finds that cities with larger, well-established rail systems have significantly higher per capita transit ridership, lower average per capita vehicle ownership and mileage, less traffic cong...
متن کاملCongestion Costing Critique : Critical Evaluation of the “ Urban Mobility Report ” Victoria
The Urban Mobility Report (UMR) is a widely-cited study that quantifies and monetizes (measures in monetary units) traffic congestion costs in U.S. metropolitan regions. This report critically examines the UMR's assumptions and methods. The UMR reflects an older planning paradigm which assumes that " transportation " means automobile travel, and so evaluates transport system performance based p...
متن کاملRail Transit In America A Comprehensive Evaluation of Benefits
This study evaluates rail transit benefits based on a comprehensive analysis of transportation system performance in major U.S. cities. It finds that cities with large, wellestablished rail systems have significantly higher per capita transit ridership, lower average per capita vehicle ownership and annual mileage, less traffic congestion, lower traffic death rates, lower consumer expenditures ...
متن کامل